Most organisations are full of capable people working hard.
You see the progress with their projects, they’re discussing their priorities in the various meetings, people are saying they have significant workloads and from a distance, it can look as though momentum is building across the organisation.
The blindspot is that activity and alignment are totally different concepts.
This week’s insight comes from a leadership team I worked with – and the gap between the appearance of progress and the commercial cost of their fractured focus.
Just because your team is working hard, it doesn’t mean they are moving the right things forward.
Imagine a child tidying their room by moving toys from one pile to another. There’s effort that you can see but the result is their room does not get clean or tidy.
A leadership team may leave a planning session believing they have clarity on their direction. Weeks later, different functions are working towards outcomes that only partially resemble one another. Nothing has gone wrong but people have simply interpreted the same direction through different priorities, pressures and operational realities.
The result is usually not visible to others immediately.
It appears over time in projects that require repeated intervention, decisions that take longer than expected and initiatives that consume considerable energy without producing the impact leadership anticipated.
What makes this challenging is that each team can appear successful when viewed in isolation because they’re putting in the hours, doing the work, meeting some of the deadlines and the presentations are showing that there is progress.
But the organisation experiences a type of tension and friction because their efforts are no longer reinforcing itself in the same direction.
Leadership teams often spend significant time setting priorities and far less attention is given to how those priorities will be interpreted once they leave the top table and move through the organisation.
This is also the hotspot of when activity replaces momentum and creates the illusion of progress.
📌 The quality of direction is not measured by how clearly it was communicated at the top, it becomes apparent in how consistently it is understood everywhere else.